any experience between the 2 from people who have ran them. im on my 2nd continental attack... and tho i liked it, i like trying new things.





so who like what... and why

 

both the metzler and the dunlop are super sticky tires

 

ive ran track days on both on my r6 both at 180/120 and i will never run anything but the qualifiers, only down to the dunlops is life for the price.... but i sacrifice 500 less miles for a tire that has never bit me and that i feel %100 comfortable on. This is my opinion from my personal experience...i tend to blow through tires because of an over aggresive riding style so it all depends on riding style really.....

 

The Metzler is super peaky.

 

I used to have some dunslop qualifiers (which i got for free) on my bike and i personally thought they sucked, i just couldn't get the traction i wanted. I witched over the M-1's and I felt a huge difference. Just seemed like they gripped the pavement ten times better.

 

Dude just go back to the michelin it is better than the m3 and lasts longer even with the way you do burn outs and drifting.

 

thats kinda how the conti is when new. i didnt like it at first but when it wore in it was better. real responsive in 0s.

 

when ever i put on a new tire i run a little less air till i get use to it and it gets broke in