Home Protection
#21
Re: Home Protection
why the hell would you keep assualt automatics in your house for "home protection"...if you shoot someone breaking into your house youre gonna kill your neighbors and their neightbors and their neighbors....get a sawed off or a normal 12g....nothing makes a theif **** their pants like hearing a shotgun **** in an unfamiliar dark place...
#22
also known as OMR
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OMR INDUSTRIES in west palm beach florida
Posts: 79,288
Re: Home Protection
why the hell would you keep assualt automatics in your house for "home protection"...if you shoot someone breaking into your house youre gonna kill your neighbors and their neightbors and their neighbors....get a sawed off or a normal 12g....nothing makes a theif **** their pants like hearing a shotgun **** in an unfamiliar dark place...
Last edited by old man roger; 02-04-2007 at 09:44 PM.
#24
Re: Home Protection
I was speaking about .380 Auto automatics.
and, by what anybody told here, it's just a dumb idea.
#25
Re: Home Protection
i keep a mossberg 500 with pistol grip and 16" barrel by my side. i keep it loaded with 3 bean bags, buck shot, and a hollow point slug. it looks similar to this minus the front pistol grip , but i ordered one just waiting for it in the mail.
i also agree with everyone else that its pretty much pointless to use a full-auto for home protection.
-the mexican
i also agree with everyone else that its pretty much pointless to use a full-auto for home protection.
-the mexican
#26
Re: Home Protection
btw these two website has some pretty cool ammo and accessories for 12gauges.
http://www.firequest.com/catalog/showcase_item_4.html
http://www.deltaforce.com/
-the mexican
http://www.firequest.com/catalog/showcase_item_4.html
http://www.deltaforce.com/
-the mexican
#30
#32
#34
#35
Re: Home Protection
im not saying use full auto for home defense but your post earlier of saying that we shouldn't be able to have assault rifles was pure bs. commie liberal bs
#36
Re: Home Protection
Don't even give me commie liberal BS, NOBODY needs to have a fully automatic assault rifle unless you are wearing camo in a foreign country, protecting our borders, or have a badge on your chest. If you don't have any of that... THEN **** YOU!!!
#37
Re: Home Protection
its called our constitutional right. something you would prob give up in a heartbeat because you'd rather hug trees and be told exactly how you can and cant live your life. But there is no point in arguing with you. You've sucked so much bleeding heart liberal kock that you'll never see it any other way. But it dosen't matter. You know why? Because it's legal to buy automatic weapons through class 3 procedures. so no my commie hearted little friend.........**** you! =)
#38
Re: Home Protection
What in theeeeee **** do you need an assault rifle for? You tell me one good damned reason you need a ****** assault rifle??
Don't even give me commie liberal BS, NOBODY needs to have a fully automatic assault rifle unless you are wearing camo in a foreign country, protecting our borders, or have a badge on your chest. If you don't have any of that... THEN **** YOU!!!
Don't even give me commie liberal BS, NOBODY needs to have a fully automatic assault rifle unless you are wearing camo in a foreign country, protecting our borders, or have a badge on your chest. If you don't have any of that... THEN **** YOU!!!
and try to explain to ya.
-- and please, if i do ANY mistake, please anyone correct me --
there are basically TWO reasons for the man of the street to have the right to possess an automatic or whatever gun:
1) the RIGHT TO FREEDOM. in its widest meaning.
there's just no plain reason for anyone with a clean record
NOT to own a machine gun. for being it a toy, a collectible, an hobby,
just like a blinged-out Busa, or a V8 supercharger, or a huge house.
Unless there's a main, striking and deadly reason, why put limits to people?
If we'd have to put limits to whatever you can own,
then why don't we outlaw big, polluting engines? they're surely more of a harm to people. And are fast.
Or we can either ban huge houses: they're more expensive to run on heating, thus more pollution:
Raceways and the racing world in itself?
oh come on, it's noisy, redneck, polluting, let's get modern: let's ban the motor racing world...
Later, people will be accustomed enough
not to bother if anything else gets banned...
Outlaws won't surely bother what's lawful or not, while carjacking you.
2) THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION:
Farley, when your Constitution was signed in 1787,
it sure was a very different world compared to now.
But not as many people tells you.
There are still political fights, wars, greed, lust and so on.
Hence you have to look at the REASON for the Constitution
to have been written that way:
the United States were coming from an War from Indipendence,
a war in wich common people fought against a ruling, oppressive government.
A Civil War, indeed...
You remember what the Second Amendment said?
Okay, you have to understand WHY it said so.
Not for fear - not only, not MAINLY - of an alien nation attacking,
but to prevent the Nation and its population from an oppressive government.
"The most important influence from the European continent was from Montesquieu, who emphasized the need to have balanced forces pushing against each other to prevent tyranny."
The US were coming right from the tyrannic goverment of the UK,
and the Fathers wanted to point this out:
No matter how many years, decades, or centuries
the US can become old:
There may always come a point
in wich a ruling government is no longer beared from its own citizens:
And we have the right to be able to remove that government from ruling.
It may be standing up as a democracy, look as a democracy,
but since he took all our rights with us just standing and watching
we couldn't help whatever decision that government takes,
since we're helpless.
You Americans quite know what i'm talking about:
the Homeland Security act and the Patriot act ( or whatever it's called )
is - to my eyes - a subtle way to take most of your rights away ( privacy, mostly ),
that's the way it goes: "it'll be for your own good"...
but leaves you hopeless and disarmed.
#39
Re: Home Protection
its called our constitutional right. something you would prob give up in a heartbeat because you'd rather hug trees and be told exactly how you can and cant live your life. But there is no point in arguing with you. You've sucked so much bleeding heart liberal kock that you'll never see it any other way. But it dosen't matter. You know why? Because it's legal to buy automatic weapons through class 3 procedures. so no my commie hearted little friend.........**** you! =)
There are entirely toooo many guns on the streets that are in the wrong hands. My dad was a cop, ex-military and I grew up in a house with over 15 different types of hand guns, shot guns, and rifles. None of them were assault rifles, but guns none the less.
If anything I am all for the right to bare arms, I will be buying my first hand gun after going through the proper classes and receiving my license to have a sidearm.
Sticking an assault rifle in peoples hands is like putting a 4'9 blonde woman in an F-650 and the only reason why she wants something that big is so she doesn't forget where she parked when she goes to the mall! It's pointless, no reason whatsoever.
Don't for one second think I am pissing on the constitution when I had infact signed up to be a Marine and defend my country. The only reason why I didn't go was b/c my family is more important than serving my country, and quite frankly I wanted to see my 2 new born nieces grow up and I wanted to finish school. Either way, I was ready and willing to bleed for my country!!! And my whole point about this entire thing is that PEOPLE ARE STUPID, and don't know how to honor and handle the constitutional right they were given... instead they would rather get drunk and ruin it for the rest of us.
Just like anything else out there, stupid people ruin it for the rest of us... just like stunters that ride wheelies down the middle of the highway. Overall, that really distorts what stunting is about and what we are trying to do as a stunt community.
But you are right, this isn't worth arguing with you b/c for some reason you feel it's more important for society to keep making the same mistakes over and over. And it's not like I'm arguing about a stupid law, something menial that means nothing... this is about guns. Big guns that cause big damage and that if in the wrong hands kills innocent people.
#40
Re: Home Protection
Farley, as you know i'm not American. and still I can see the point,
and try to explain to ya.
-- and please, if i do ANY mistake, please anyone correct me --
there are basically TWO reasons for the man of the street to have the right to possess an automatic or whatever gun:
1) the RIGHT TO FREEDOM. in its widest meaning.
there's just no plain reason for anyone with a clean record
NOT to own a machine gun. for being it a toy, a collectible, an hobby,
just like a blinged-out Busa, or a V8 supercharger, or a huge house.
Unless there's a main, striking and deadly reason, why put limits to people?
If we'd have to put limits to whatever you can own,
then why don't we outlaw big, polluting engines? they're surely more of a harm to people. And are fast.
Or we can either ban huge houses: they're more expensive to run on heating, thus more pollution:
Raceways and the racing world in itself?
oh come on, it's noisy, redneck, polluting, let's get modern: let's ban the motor racing world...
Later, people will be accustomed enough
not to bother if anything else gets banned...
Outlaws won't surely bother what's lawful or not, while carjacking you.
2) THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION:
Farley, when your Constitution was signed in 1787,
it sure was a very different world compared to now.
But not as many people tells you.
There are still political fights, wars, greed, lust and so on.
Hence you have to look at the REASON for the Constitution
to have been written that way:
the United States were coming from an War from Indipendence,
a war in wich common people fought against a ruling, oppressive government.
A Civil War, indeed...
You remember what the Second Amendment said?
Okay, you have to understand WHY it said so.
Not for fear - not only, not MAINLY - of an alien nation attacking,
but to prevent the Nation and its population from an oppressive government.
"The most important influence from the European continent was from Montesquieu, who emphasized the need to have balanced forces pushing against each other to prevent tyranny."
The US were coming right from the tyrannic goverment of the UK,
and the Fathers wanted to point this out:
No matter how many years, decades, or centuries
the US can become old:
There may always come a point
in wich a ruling government is no longer beared from its own citizens:
And we have the right to be able to remove that government from ruling.
It may be standing up as a democracy, look as a democracy,
but since he took all our rights with us just standing and watching
we couldn't help whatever decision that government takes,
since we're helpless.
You Americans quite know what i'm talking about:
the Homeland Security act and the Patriot act ( or whatever it's called )
is - to my eyes - a subtle way to take most of your rights away ( privacy, mostly ),
that's the way it goes: "it'll be for your own good"...
but leaves you hopeless and disarmed.
and try to explain to ya.
-- and please, if i do ANY mistake, please anyone correct me --
there are basically TWO reasons for the man of the street to have the right to possess an automatic or whatever gun:
1) the RIGHT TO FREEDOM. in its widest meaning.
there's just no plain reason for anyone with a clean record
NOT to own a machine gun. for being it a toy, a collectible, an hobby,
just like a blinged-out Busa, or a V8 supercharger, or a huge house.
Unless there's a main, striking and deadly reason, why put limits to people?
If we'd have to put limits to whatever you can own,
then why don't we outlaw big, polluting engines? they're surely more of a harm to people. And are fast.
Or we can either ban huge houses: they're more expensive to run on heating, thus more pollution:
Raceways and the racing world in itself?
oh come on, it's noisy, redneck, polluting, let's get modern: let's ban the motor racing world...
Later, people will be accustomed enough
not to bother if anything else gets banned...
Outlaws won't surely bother what's lawful or not, while carjacking you.
2) THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION:
Farley, when your Constitution was signed in 1787,
it sure was a very different world compared to now.
But not as many people tells you.
There are still political fights, wars, greed, lust and so on.
Hence you have to look at the REASON for the Constitution
to have been written that way:
the United States were coming from an War from Indipendence,
a war in wich common people fought against a ruling, oppressive government.
A Civil War, indeed...
You remember what the Second Amendment said?
Okay, you have to understand WHY it said so.
Not for fear - not only, not MAINLY - of an alien nation attacking,
but to prevent the Nation and its population from an oppressive government.
"The most important influence from the European continent was from Montesquieu, who emphasized the need to have balanced forces pushing against each other to prevent tyranny."
The US were coming right from the tyrannic goverment of the UK,
and the Fathers wanted to point this out:
No matter how many years, decades, or centuries
the US can become old:
There may always come a point
in wich a ruling government is no longer beared from its own citizens:
And we have the right to be able to remove that government from ruling.
It may be standing up as a democracy, look as a democracy,
but since he took all our rights with us just standing and watching
we couldn't help whatever decision that government takes,
since we're helpless.
You Americans quite know what i'm talking about:
the Homeland Security act and the Patriot act ( or whatever it's called )
is - to my eyes - a subtle way to take most of your rights away ( privacy, mostly ),
that's the way it goes: "it'll be for your own good"...
but leaves you hopeless and disarmed.
thats some deep thinking right there, but i totally agree with you
-the mexican