I've been busy...
Re: I've been busy...
I want to see the others!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger_Badger_Badger
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badger_Badger_Badger
Re: I've been busy...
IMO, there is sort of a minimum and maximum thickness for blunts, think of a bell curve. If its thinner than a bic pen, a dense spot in the weed can cause it to go out abruptly. If its too thick, its hard to keep uniform air flow through the blunt, which makes it burn unevenly. Besides the obvious canoing, the amount of waste increases, due to slow parts burning after the vacuum has already passed them.
My research concludes that the optimum diameter (assuming filling it is not an issue) is roughly the size of a sharpie. As the diameter passes that mark, the amount of waste increases drastically, while the level of unwasted smoke barely changes.
My research concludes that the optimum diameter (assuming filling it is not an issue) is roughly the size of a sharpie. As the diameter passes that mark, the amount of waste increases drastically, while the level of unwasted smoke barely changes.
Re: I've been busy...
IMO, there is sort of a minimum and maximum thickness for blunts, think of a bell curve. If its thinner than a bic pen, a dense spot in the weed can cause it to go out abruptly. If its too thick, its hard to keep uniform air flow through the blunt, which makes it burn unevenly. Besides the obvious canoing, the amount of waste increases, due to slow parts burning after the vacuum has already passed them.
My research concludes that the optimum diameter (assuming filling it is not an issue) is roughly the size of a sharpie. As the diameter passes that mark, the amount of waste increases drastically, while the level of unwasted smoke barely changes.
My research concludes that the optimum diameter (assuming filling it is not an issue) is roughly the size of a sharpie. As the diameter passes that mark, the amount of waste increases drastically, while the level of unwasted smoke barely changes.







