Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
STOP THE BUCKING!!!!!!!!!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,720
From: SO CAL
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by Ryan Cramer
i wasnt hatin on the situation either and my decision to quit riding was so that i could go back to school and finish my bachelors degree, in my list of things to worry about, respect from nut swingers like you was non existant
Thread Starter
Wheelie Ninja!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,755
From: Las Vegas NV
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Yo matt!!
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
u of m still sux
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,351
From: Detroit
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by Kaneone
Yo matt!!
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
i swear if your buddy keiths mouth wasnt around your ****, you'd be giving yourself head.
and golf?, please. i play baseball
Last edited by Ryan Cramer; Jul 16, 2006 at 09:32 PM.
u of m still sux
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,351
From: Detroit
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by FSPalex
that is my point. and you shouldnt have edited your post 
on the subject of risk, theres a nice clip on up on one of some guy doing a 1000ft on a beat up 1000 huckin em up at about 120 wearing a tshirt and jeans...now that guy can go cry me a river,,what a *****
I Chose to No Longer Post
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37,827
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by Sinista
i didnt say you were hating on his record you were just hating on the situation in genereal..just cause your washed up and out the game dosent mean everyone has to be..props kane...keepit uppimp..
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 559
From: the fukin moon
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by Kaneone
Yo matt!!
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
I can totally agree with what your saying.
the speed was radared AFTER the rear was in the air and the stipulation was that I HAD to roll it to a complete stop in order for it to count.
I was amazed at how much speed I dropped so quickly.
the entire first day of practice I spent working on cutting the speed it scrubbed before getting the tire up in half.
rolling 1000 ft is definately dangerous, risking life and limb!? gimme a break.. if your worried about risk then take up golf. go do 6th gear stock geared endos on a liter bike and then talk to me about life and limb.. dont be silly.. haha
-Kane
good Job!!
be fu(kin hard to crack that one (depending what speed you got)
when do we find out what speed you got (seen as we dont get tv in here in Australia lol)
Thread Starter
Wheelie Ninja!
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,755
From: Las Vegas NV
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
as soon as the episode airs I will format it into .wmv format on my site for everyone to view.
Originally Posted by MattMingay
good Job!!
be fu(kin hard to crack that one (depending what speed you got)
when do we find out what speed you got (seen as we dont get tv in here in Australia lol)
be fu(kin hard to crack that one (depending what speed you got)
when do we find out what speed you got (seen as we dont get tv in here in Australia lol)
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 687
From: Kansas
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Nice work, Kane. If you got the Kawi from that deal....even nicer. I read just about every post in this thread. There has been a lot of hype on here about stoppies lately. I think it's great. I think people need to accept this for what it is. I also think that a stoppie has classifications much like a wheelie....Not all stoppies are the same..Obviously, some fast, slow, high and low. All different styles. I think this type of stoppie appeals to the public much more than a 50mph floater because speed is something everybody can relate to. People watching the discovery channel would have to recognize the difficulty involved in a high distance stoppie. It's much easier to relate to and get excited telling your buddy you saw a crazy biker boy on tv last night doing one of those nose wheelies at 160mph!!! Than, yo, some guy broke the world record on a long endo. It would relate more to the guy who rides endos than someone who does not. IMO.
So for what it is, I say good job Kane for getting it in the public eye. The danger of possibly exploding a line or your brakes grabbing and tossing you at high speed from a nasty slapper is pretty exciting....
On to another note:
High speed/low altitude fly-by's don't necessarily carry the credibility amongst the riders and I think that may be some of the issues in here. The preparation and skill for this is much less extensive than for rolling long distances which is what may be causing the debate......At least that is what I derived from everything.
And Ryan, don't get upset. I'm right there with you in the "washed up 1000ft has-been club." I'd rather carry that title than "still in the game talking trash only rolling 400ft" club.
I'll end it with nice job Kane.
Nice bike lift, by the way. Can I borrow it? It'll be both ours, I'll just keep it at my house.
So for what it is, I say good job Kane for getting it in the public eye. The danger of possibly exploding a line or your brakes grabbing and tossing you at high speed from a nasty slapper is pretty exciting....
On to another note:
High speed/low altitude fly-by's don't necessarily carry the credibility amongst the riders and I think that may be some of the issues in here. The preparation and skill for this is much less extensive than for rolling long distances which is what may be causing the debate......At least that is what I derived from everything.
And Ryan, don't get upset. I'm right there with you in the "washed up 1000ft has-been club." I'd rather carry that title than "still in the game talking trash only rolling 400ft" club.
I'll end it with nice job Kane.
Nice bike lift, by the way. Can I borrow it? It'll be both ours, I'll just keep it at my house.
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 316
From: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by Ryan Cramer
he sure knows how to put things in perspective doesnt he?
Now if the bastard would just come work for 2Wheel Tuner already!
u of m still sux
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,351
From: Detroit
Re: Discovery's Stunt Junkies - Kaneone
Originally Posted by big dave
Now if the bastard would just come work for 2Wheel Tuner already!
tell him nick will cuddle with him on the weekends if he comes and writes...lol
he would be a good writer though
