Stunter's bike review needed
Stunter's bike review needed
ok all over there are polls about which is the better bike for stunters how about stepping the game up to the next level and get a few well rounded stunters who can get together and do a review on the different bikes going back for couple of years say maybe last five years or so just devote days to riding them just like how motorcycleusa does the shoot out but from the stunters point of view and all on stock level and maybe just a few minor mods to bring to better level of stunt bike.
ok guys and girls lets hear some input to this
ok guys and girls lets hear some input to this
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
Originally Posted by Paluka
ok all over there are polls about which is the better bike for stunters how about stepping the game up to the next level and get a few well rounded stunters who can get together and do a review on the different bikes going back for couple of years say maybe last five years or so just devote days to riding them just like how motorcycleusa does the shoot out but from the stunters point of view and all on stock level and maybe just a few minor mods to bring to better level of stunt bike.
ok guys and girls lets hear some input to this
ok guys and girls lets hear some input to this
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
I think he's trying to say do a "Stunt 600cc Shoot Out" like they do in Sport Rider / Cycle Word, etc....
Have Dairus, Kyle Woods, etc big top stunters test out the bikes and give their review like for instance in wheelies the balance point is steep on xxx bike while once you redline it felt flimsy ... and al lthat detailed ones.
Have Dairus, Kyle Woods, etc big top stunters test out the bikes and give their review like for instance in wheelies the balance point is steep on xxx bike while once you redline it felt flimsy ... and al lthat detailed ones.
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
i really think this is a dumb idea, why not just look at what their riding... duh. why in the hell would they ride something they didn't think was the best? (barring sponsorship of course)
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
Well i dont think its a dumb idea and not all the pros in the sport ride the same bike further more its just a review, we all know that people have there favorites but it just shows the dedication to the sport not just doing stunts, and if you take the time out and stop hating like a cheerleader there might be interesting point comin from the review. Polls tells you what someone likes, review tells the good and the bad about the bikes, but then maybe you dont like your bike you just like stunting well for me i love the sport an love bikes so sorry if this didnt make sense and now i see why all the top name guys dont post on this site like before its all about hating and not getting anywhere now days, an you know what i dont care if i get bashed for this now cause thats all that seems to happen. every now and then you see a good post and then the drama starts i might as well go join a girlie site for all the hating thats goes on, I know its good to share your opinion but if its not in a positive manner just let it go.
there need to be a place where its all positive for this sport to get anywhere if thats what we want. come on guys woooo saaaah woooo saaaah
there need to be a place where its all positive for this sport to get anywhere if thats what we want. come on guys woooo saaaah woooo saaaah
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
here ya go:
636: light, powerful, easy to work on. noisy motors, weak parts. good brakes
cbr600rr: little top heavy, great brakes. honda comfort. horrible to work on.
gix6: dunno? nice front end now, not as tiny as the others.
yamr6: dunno? small bike, agressive seating.
f4i: garbage front end. indestructable. top heavy. makes tricks look too slow.
636: light, powerful, easy to work on. noisy motors, weak parts. good brakes
cbr600rr: little top heavy, great brakes. honda comfort. horrible to work on.
gix6: dunno? nice front end now, not as tiny as the others.
yamr6: dunno? small bike, agressive seating.
f4i: garbage front end. indestructable. top heavy. makes tricks look too slow.
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
Originally Posted by TEACH C6
here ya go:
636: light, powerful, easy to work on. noisy motors, weak parts. good brakes
cbr600rr: little top heavy, great brakes. honda comfort. horrible to work on.
gix6: dunno? nice front end now, not as tiny as the others.
yamr6: dunno? small bike, agressive seating.
f4i: garbage front end. indestructable. top heavy. makes tricks look too slow.
636: light, powerful, easy to work on. noisy motors, weak parts. good brakes
cbr600rr: little top heavy, great brakes. honda comfort. horrible to work on.
gix6: dunno? nice front end now, not as tiny as the others.
yamr6: dunno? small bike, agressive seating.
f4i: garbage front end. indestructable. top heavy. makes tricks look too slow.
Re: Stunter's bike review needed
they are garbage right now...i had to take one with crushed headers and the forks cut right off of it!! i luckily grabbed all the parts for them though and should be up and running in a week!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








haha hit that right on 